The Shelton School District Board of Directors met in
regular session at
Board members present: Chairman Holly Sharpe, Sue McCausland, Gene Crater, Julianna Miljour, and Peter Boome.
Staff members present:
Others present: Jeff Green, Dedrick Allen, Terri Hauser, Angela Ballard, Amy Ledgerwood and Helen Thomson.
CALL TO ORDER
Chairman Sharpe called the
meeting to order at
ADOPTION OF THE AGENDA
There were three changes to the agenda:
1) Deletion of Item 8.04 – Discussion of the use of Drake Funds;
2) Deletion of Item 11.01 – Budget status report; and
3) Addition of Item 9.05 – Supplemental personnel report.
Items 8.04 and 11.01 will be
back on the June 24 board agenda for discussion when
Holly Sharpe read the district’s
Mission Statement.
COMMENTS ON AGENDA ITEMS
§ Terri Hauser, Helen Thomson and Angela Ballard, all parents of students in the self-contained Hi-Cap classroom at Evergreen, and Marya Tyler, the current self-contained classroom teacher, voiced their concerns about the elimination of the self-contained classroom next year. They wanting answers as to why the self-contained program was discontinued; asked why there were no self-contained parents on the Hi-Cap Advisory Committee; felt the committee completely ignored their concerns; wanted to know who would be administering the program next year; said they would not have allowed their children to move to the self-contained classroom had then know it was going to be eliminated; felt the high end students were being sacrificed for the lower end students; and wanted E.A.’s for next year’s enrichments classes, as well as math and reading level tiering.
Chairman
Sharpe thanked everyone for their comments.
However, she said the problem is that there is no funding for highly
capable students and probably never will be because of No Child Left Behind. The district only as so many funds to serve
all of the district’s students, not just the 10 students served in the
self-contained classroom at Evergreen.
BOARD MEMBER COMMENTS
§ Gene Crater has spent time the last several weeks visiting with teachers at Oakland Bay Junior High.
§
Sue McCausland was unable to attend CHOICE
graduation but did go the
§ Holly Sharpe attended 4 graduation ceremonies during one week on both the west and east coasts.
§
Peter Boome told the Hi-Cap parents that he also
has a daughter who is very intelligent and it’s frustrating to figure out how
to meet her needs within the structure of the district. It is equally frustrating for him being on
the school board, but it always boils down to funding. Peter took advantage of this time to say that
he himself just graduated from college and has been accepted into law school at
the
REPORTS
7.01 – Report from the Hi-Cap Advisory Committee:
Sue Feldman, Deb Fausti and Amy Ledgerwood, members of the
Hi-Cap Advisory Committee, reported on the interim proposal for next year’s
Hi-Cap program. The committee was made
up of Wendy Wilson-Hoss and Amy Ledgerwood from
The committee was given the task of finding the most effective way to configure the Hi-Cap program for next year. The following is their proposal:
1.
Individual
schools will have the responsibility of creating a building-wide program, using
research-based best practices to meet the needs of their gifted and highly
capable students.
2.
Evergreen,
3.
For
this interim year, assessments will be given in September to identify students
who are gifted, using a common district identification process. The identification process will use WAC*
defined, research-based multiple criteria, including recognized cognitive
assessments and measures of achievement (standardized tests). Schools may propose assessment processes for
their trial program year. Should no identification process be in place,
teacher(s) will conduct assessments in accordance with the Hi-Cap
administration and school building administrator's direction. A selection
committee consistent with OSPI guidelines will collaborate on identifying
students in need of highly capable accommodations.
4.
At
each building, the Principal, as well as a committee of teachers, the Hi-Cap
teacher, and parents (if they wish to be included), will develop and implement
a program addressing the needs of their gifted and highly capable student
population. Part of the program design and assessment process will include
gathering bi-annual parent and teacher input through surveys or meetings. The
building-wide program will be reviewed and adjusted as needed during the first
year, and yearly thereafter. The committee will self-monitor, and be monitored
by the district, to insure it employs recognized (OSPI and NAGC) best practices
providing opportunities appropriate to their resident gifted students (see
appendices).
5.
When
possible, the district will offer professional development opportunities for
all teachers on topics of emerging interest in Gifted/ Hi-Cap education. Topics
to examine might include: Ability grouping, Grade level clusters, Accelerated
study/independent programs, “pull out” groups vs. working in the classroom,
differentiated instruction, social/emotional needs, and inquiry
investigations.
6.
Hi-Cap
teacher schedules will need to be designed to account for any special projects
the program design entails. For example, schools may want the Hi-Cap teacher to
facilitate an enrichment activity for the school, such as an “invention
convention,” art fair, art night, artist in residence, history displays,
science
night, spelling bee, math night, a geography club, math club, science club, chess club, etc. The
time for this work must come out of the school’s program time.
Board
members thanked the committee for all their work in developing the
proposal. They will hold their comments
until the next meeting when the superintendent can be present for discussion.
7.02
– Recognition of Peter Boome:
As Peter
announced earlier in the meeting, he is resigning from the school board
effective
DISCUSSION
8.01 – Proposed 2007-08 end of year Hi-Cap report and
2008-09 grant proposal:
Chairman Sharpe announced that these two items would be separated and only the 2007-08 year end report would be heard tonight. The proposed 2008-09 grant proposal will be back on the next board agenda for discussion when the superintendent can be present.
Sue Feldman then gave the 2007-08 year-end report. We cannot propose the 2008-09 plan without having board approval of the 2007-08 plan verifying we did all the things we said we would in the Hi-Cap program with this year’s grant money. This year we received $37,000 to run the program but the actual cost to the district was $157,000. A total of 241 students were served in the elementary schools and we were funded for 92 students. Sue McCausland moved, seconded by Julianna Miljour, to approve the 2007-08 year-end report. The motion passed unanimously.
8.02 – Proposed Tier III secondary level reading
adoption:
Margo Otto and Dan Kass reported on the proposed Tier III
reading adoption for grades 9-12 at a cost of $34,000. This proposal comes from a focused sub
committee from the District’s Literacy Team called the Tier III Reading
Committee. The focus work of the
committee was to research and find an appropriate program and materials for our
students that struggle with reading.
Margo and Dan then explained the process the group when through to get
to this final curriculum adoption proposal and shared a brief PowerPoint
presentation. Sue McCausland moved,
seconded by Julianna Miljour, to approve the Tier III reading adoption as
presented. The motion passed
unanimously.
8.03 – Proposed 2008-09 agreement with
The proposed 2008-09 Interlocal Agreement with
CONSENT AGENDA
Sue McCausland made a motion to approve the consent agenda with the addition of Item 9.05. Gene Crater seconded the motion and the motion passed unanimously. The board:
§
Approved minutes from the
§
Approved summer travel for the
§ Approved the proposed 2008-09 salary schedules for certificated administrators reflecting the 4.4% state cost of living salary increase.
§ Approved the regular and supplemental personnel reports and submitted and as attached. (See Attachment #1.)
FOR THE GOOD OF
THE ORDER
§
Retirement reception for John Hill on June 18th
from
§
Sgwi’ Gwi on June 20th at
EXECUTIVE SESSION
At
The board returned to regular session at
ACTION TAKEN AS A
RESULT OF EXECUTIVE SESSION
Peter Boome made a motion to extend Superintendent Joan Zook’s contract by one year until June 2011 and pass through the 4.4% cost of living increase for the 2008-09 school year. Julianna Miljour seconded the motion. The motion passed 4-1 with Gene Crater voting against.
ADJOURN
Chairman Sharpe adjourned the meeting at
Chairman, Board of Directors
Secretary to the Board